Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1925 French Championships (tennis)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, keep. -- RG ² 02:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1925 French Championships (tennis)[edit]

Entirely redundant to 1925 French Championships - Men's Singles and 1925 French Championships - Women's Singles. We have one of these articles for every year, and each one is identical bar the names. In each case we have articles on the competition, the "list of champions of the 19xx French Championships" articles all contain exactly four names, of which two are champions and two are not. And the way it's worded you actually have to click through to work out whether "defeated" means "A defeated B" or A (defeated) vs. B. A list which can only have two members, or four if you include the defeated non-champion, is not really much of a list. Why do we need three articles on each year's championship? Cruftbane 19:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeu, set, et match pour Delete--Victor falk 21:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, and consider merging the men's/women's articles into this single article. As for the current situation, when looking at the men's results, for example, it is good to have a non-category link where the women's results can also be found. Neier 12:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER 94 12:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MaxSem 06:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - redundant to already existing articles. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 13:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Have expanded the article to include information on the doubles champions and that it was the first French Championship open to non French players. I am sure more information can be added to the article such as juniors which mean that the article is not redundant. Davewild 07:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even if there is little info on all 3 aspects in earlier years, with all the info in more recent years, it is worth it for consistency Mbisanz 23:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.