User talk:Lunamoonunit

Welcome!

Hello, Lunamoonunit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Almost Famous. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to date[edit]

Hello, I'm Ronz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think your edits to Dennis Prager are part of a pattern from you that directly conflict with Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I'm surprised that none of the other editors who've reverted your changes in pov to articles hadn't notified you before. --Ronz (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for information about Dennis Prager's movie, there was none on his Wikipedia page so I added it. How is that directly in conflict with Wikipedia's goal?

Adryana Cortez moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Adryana Cortez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adryana Cortez (November 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adryana Cortez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adryana Cortez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lunamoonunit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adryana Cortez[edit]

Hello, Lunamoonunit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adryana Cortez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Courrielche[edit]

Do you have some affiliation or connection to Patrick Courrielche? I ask in relation to Wikipedia's COI policy. Neutrality^talk 19:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No.

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Pythoncoder. Unfortunately, content you added to Nixon White House tapes appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your characterization that my entry was a "minority or fringe viewpoint" does not align with the sources I provided. My entry was based not only on Nixon's lead accuser, and the government's primary witness, John Dean, but that of Nixon's defense counsel and the FBI's official opinion as well. The Wikipedia page on the subject cites John Dean as the primary witness, whose testimony led to the judge's order to release the White House Tapes. My addition cites John Dean's own assessment on the matter, and I cite his book where he in turn cites the FBI's official statement on the matter. Additionally, I cited a member of Nixon's defense counsel. My entry was just a statement of fact. Given this, how is this a "minority or fringe viewpoint"? Lunamoonunit (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]