User talk:193.62.3.251

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to become an administrator
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! - BanyanTree 15:49, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contribution(s) to to the Wikipedia article Everton Water Tower are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 15:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Human–computer interaction on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Shadowlynk 11:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--207.195.254.221 16:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jack Charlton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 16:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


NOTE - This is a university IP address, so all of the traffic comes from different vandals.

Your recent edit to Sediment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made 16 April 2007 to List of famous people from Merseyside[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- LeCourT:C 21:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Birkenhead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Joe D (t) 15:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birkenhead[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Birkenhead, you will be blocked from editing. --RFBailey 16:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]



This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to David Simpson, you will be blocked from editing. Jeepday 15:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Birkenhead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Barm page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Brian 15:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quantitative research, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Quantitative research was changed by 193.62.3.251 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-21T14:41:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mosque, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mosque was changed by 193.62.3.251 (u) (t) deleting 35516 characters on 2008-02-04T19:57:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Duty of care constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 21:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to C. J. de Mooi, you will be blocked from editing. Abrech (talk) 13:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Christopher Hughes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ged UK (talk) 16:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daphne Fowler, you will be blocked from editing. Ged UK (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Marasmusine (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Neuron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 11:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to St. George Of England High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for another 72 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini háblame aquí 12:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ashley Cole has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ashley Cole constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Quantum of Solace has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jake Wartenbergtalk 13:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Gerrard, you will be blocked from editing. Mosmof (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mendoza, you will be blocked from editing. -gadfium 20:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Subroutine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SpitfireTally-ho! 10:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ruel Fox. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tmol42 (talk) 12:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. gadfium 17:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 16:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Modern dance worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Annual report has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Thomas Barkhuizen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 15:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Constitution of the United Kingdom. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Jan1naD (talkcontrib) 10:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Truth and reconciliation commission, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- CyberDiablo 15:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Constitution of the United Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. (talk) 14:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Edge Hill University has been reverted.
Your edit here to Edge Hill University was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/edgehilluniversity) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Guðsþegn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Strabane because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Guðsþegn (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 21:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I noticed that you recently made an edit to St James' Park that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jonathanfu (talk) 11:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to St James' Park with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Makecat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Liam Bridcutt, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Makecat 15:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Netherlands national football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Milton because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Witchcraft may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eye–hand coordination without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 14:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Scudamore have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hydromania. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hydromania (talk) 09:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 03:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British & Irish Lions, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]