User contributions for Mehmeett21
A user with 946 edits. Account created on 9 November 2013.
22 March 2015
- 15:5715:57, 22 March 2015 diff hist +438 Tarkhan dynasty No edit summary
- 15:5315:53, 22 March 2015 diff hist −312 User talk:Mehmeett21 ←Blanked the page
- 15:5315:53, 22 March 2015 diff hist −1,142 User talk:Mehmeett21 No edit summary
20 March 2015
- 15:5615:56, 20 March 2015 diff hist −723 Northern Han Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
- 15:5415:54, 20 March 2015 diff hist −255 Later Han (Five Dynasties) Modern resources read Wikipedia rules Tag: nowiki added
- 15:5215:52, 20 March 2015 diff hist −726 Later Jin (Five Dynasties) Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
- 15:5015:50, 20 March 2015 diff hist −895 Later Tang rv Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
- 08:1008:10, 20 March 2015 diff hist −348 Later Tang Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
- 08:0808:08, 20 March 2015 diff hist −1,161 Later Han (Five Dynasties) Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
- 08:0608:06, 20 March 2015 diff hist −723 Northern Han Modern resources read Wikipedia rules
19 March 2015
- 20:1620:16, 19 March 2015 diff hist −92 m Northern Han modern sources plz
- 19:2719:27, 19 March 2015 diff hist −1 Northern Han you have too old sources come on 1000 years, according Han Dynasty Xiongnu would be Turkic. and it is already considered a Chinese State
- 19:2519:25, 19 March 2015 diff hist −424 Later Han (Five Dynasties) rv you have too old sources come on 1000 years, according Han Dynasty Xiongnu would be Turkic
- 19:2019:20, 19 March 2015 diff hist −42 m Later Tang fixed
- 19:1919:19, 19 March 2015 diff hist −307 Later Tang you are too old sources come on 1000 years, according Han Dynasty Xiongnu would be Turkic
- 19:1619:16, 19 March 2015 diff hist −630 Northern Han →Founding of the Northern Han
- 19:1519:15, 19 March 2015 diff hist −737 Later Han (Five Dynasties) you are too old sources come on 1000 years, according Han Dynasty Xiongnu would be Turkic
- 19:1319:13, 19 March 2015 diff hist −726 Later Jin (Five Dynasties) you are too old sources come on 1000 years, according Han Dynasty Xiongnu would be Turkic
- 16:5316:53, 19 March 2015 diff hist +1 m Later Tang why is this importent to you it is an sinicized and counted as a Chinese State
- 16:4216:42, 19 March 2015 diff hist +445 Later Tang rv refernces
- 16:3816:38, 19 March 2015 diff hist −84 Later Tang fuck off you make eweryting chinese
17 March 2015
- 14:1914:19, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1,205 First Bulgarian Empire look on talk page my refernce is there!
- 14:1714:17, 17 March 2015 diff hist +9 m Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →Number of slavs vs Number of Bulgars
- 14:1614:16, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1 m Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →Number of slavs vs Number of Bulgars
- 14:1614:16, 17 March 2015 diff hist +37 m Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →Number of slavs vs Number of Bulgars
- 14:1514:15, 17 March 2015 diff hist +260 Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →Number of slavs vs Number of Bulgars
- 07:5907:59, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1 m First Bulgarian Empire <ref>https://books.google.se/books?id=-h5Z8CEA5bkC&pg=PA308&lpg=PA308&dq=old+great+bulgaria+turkic&source=bl&ots=XsbYbINOQ-&sig=j8-WOEjL1aJIgP4hQ39gIkA-rVI&hl=sv&sa=X&ei=g90HVZm5D5LYauzFgpgD&ved=0CGoQ6AEwCTgo#v=onepage&q=old%20great%20bulgaria%20 </ref>
- 07:5507:55, 17 March 2015 diff hist +1,204 First Bulgarian Empire pavel here is it https://books.google.se/books?id=-h5Z8CEA5bkC&pg=PA308&lpg=PA308&dq=old+great+bulgaria+turkic&source=bl&ots=XsbYbINOQ-&sig=j8-WOEjL1aJIgP4hQ39gIkA-rVI&hl=sv&sa=X&ei=g90HVZm5D5LYauzFgpgD&ved=0CGoQ6AEwCTgo#v=onepage&q=old%20great%20bulgaria
16 March 2015
- 20:1820:18, 16 March 2015 diff hist +10 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Mehmeett21 reported by User:Gligan (Result: )
- 20:1720:17, 16 March 2015 diff hist +257 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Mehmeett21 reported by User:Gligan (Result: )
- 18:1918:19, 16 March 2015 diff hist −2,066 User talk:Mehmeett21 ←Blanked the page
- 17:2817:28, 16 March 2015 diff hist +56 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Mehmeett21 reported by User:Gligan (Result: )
- 17:2017:20, 16 March 2015 diff hist +180 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Mehmeett21 reported by User:Gligan (Result: )
- 17:0617:06, 16 March 2015 diff hist +81 Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →bulgarian empire is turkic
- 17:0117:01, 16 March 2015 diff hist +127 Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →bulgarian empire is turkic
- 16:4016:40, 16 March 2015 diff hist +473 First Bulgarian Empire okay we can keep doing this then we will see what the admins think
- 16:3116:31, 16 March 2015 diff hist +37 Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →bulgarian empire is turkic
- 16:3116:31, 16 March 2015 diff hist +70 Talk:First Bulgarian Empire →bulgarian empire is turkic: new section
- 16:2916:29, 16 March 2015 diff hist +473 First Bulgarian Empire and discuss before you remove
- 16:0516:05, 16 March 2015 diff hist +27 m First Bulgarian Empire accept that the First Bulgarian Empire is Turkic ask yourselves why would someone non-Turkic state is called the khanate and have tengrism as a religion
- 15:5415:54, 16 March 2015 diff hist +418 First Bulgarian Empire vandalism
- 15:2115:21, 16 March 2015 diff hist +9 m First Bulgarian Empire No edit summary
15 March 2015
- 15:4515:45, 15 March 2015 diff hist +1 m Old Great Bulgaria No edit summary
- 15:2515:25, 15 March 2015 diff hist −123 m Old Great Bulgaria wrong referns
- 14:3314:33, 15 March 2015 diff hist +415 Old Great Bulgaria new refernces
- 14:1714:17, 15 March 2015 diff hist +395 First Bulgarian Empire new refernes
- 13:3813:38, 15 March 2015 diff hist −356 Old Great Bulgaria No edit summary
- 13:2513:25, 15 March 2015 diff hist +9 Volga Bulgaria fixed refernces page
- 12:5712:57, 15 March 2015 diff hist −406 Old Great Bulgaria No edit summary
- 09:4809:48, 15 March 2015 diff hist +1,251 Northern Han dont remove my refernces!!!!!
