User contributions for 97.102.79.98

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

05:4205:42, 13 August 2017 diff hist +867‎ Talk:Tokyo Ghoul (film) ‎ is this the correct pronoun for the reviewer? also, article may need updating if film has been released

03:3103:31, 10 June 2017 diff hist +5‎ The Marriage Plot ‎ tweaked final sentence of intro; it was not universally "well-received by critics", so I changed the line to "well received by many critics" to better reflect the balance of reactions the book appears to have received
03:2803:28, 10 June 2017 diff hist +2,406‎ The Marriage Plot ‎ →‎Critical reception: additional material + citation (review from The Atlantic, which is from mainstream publication and appears to have high google ranking in connection to the author/book implying it is commonly/popularly referenced elsewhere)

02:1102:11, 26 May 2017 diff hist +380‎ Motion graphic design ‎ moved "typical motion graphic designer" bit up from Technology section to introduction (where it makes more sense) though also modified to less declarative of what is "typical", given no cite was given for the "typical...is" claim; +'d relevant See Alsos
02:0302:03, 26 May 2017 diff hist −88‎ Motion graphic design ‎ →‎Technology: neutralized some wording (it sounded really puffed-up on first read), rearranged a little, and tweaked for more encyclopedic feel. Some areas could still use better sourcing though.
01:2801:28, 26 May 2017 diff hist −44‎ Motion graphic design ‎ Removed and tweaked non-neutral and non-encyclopedic wording from introduction.
00:3200:32, 26 May 2017 diff hist +1,006‎ Talk:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series ‎ could use clarification on eligibility definition, specifically re: if there is an explicit set differentiation (vs a subjective one) between Supporting and Lead actress

09:3009:30, 18 March 2017 diff hist +1,565‎ Talk:Islam ‎ why does "Arabic mythology" redirect to a general article on Islam when a.) Islam isn't just seen in "Arabic" culture and b- the pages that link to "arabic mythology" are folklore-related not religious-related?

02:2802:28, 27 February 2017 diff hist +98‎ Wayne Enterprises ‎ →‎Powerless: updated so that it no longer refers to an "upcoming" TV series, as the series is now out

21:3921:39, 8 February 2017 diff hist +248‎ Talk:Sin (mythology) ‎ →‎Lucifer?: minor correction to my own statement
21:3421:34, 8 February 2017 diff hist +9,167‎ Talk:Sin (mythology) ‎ →‎Lucifer?: No, nope, no, nada, nope, and insert appropriate number of additional "nopes".

03:5603:56, 1 September 2016 diff hist +1,196‎ Talk:Philippine adobo ‎ incorrect link for one of the sources cited?

22:0122:01, 27 May 2016 diff hist +2,843‎ Talk:Endocannibalism ‎ this wording seems a bit too close to a persuasive essay, doesn't it? Is it trying to summarize the study's conclusions and if so, should it not be worded as such?
19:2519:25, 27 May 2016 diff hist +626‎ Talk:Brain fag syndrome ‎ →‎Brain Fag is associated with western classrooms
19:1519:15, 27 May 2016 diff hist +1,362‎ Talk:Ataque de nervios ‎No edit summary

06:5206:52, 23 May 2016 diff hist +3,237‎ Talk:DC Rebirth ‎ lots of announcements of future releases in the charts here are listed as firm past tense as if they have already happened, but at literally future dates? this doesn't seem right

02:4902:49, 17 December 2015 diff hist 0‎ Heathenry (new religious movement) ‎ →‎Racial issues: flipping the positioning of "universalist" and "folkish" in the "they're called this, respectively", because grammatically in ref to previous sentence it accidentally identifies the positions incorrectly by implication