User contributions for 67.182.157.6

22 October 2005

• 20:5220:52, 22 October 2005 diff hist −1,171‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ nonsense personal attack deleted second time
• 15:0615:06, 22 October 2005 diff hist −1,171‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ nonsense personal attack deleted

21 October 2005

• 16:3116:31, 21 October 2005 diff hist −1,171‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ nonsense deleted

26 September 2005

• 20:1120:11, 26 September 2005 diff hist −456‎ Agnosticism ‎ agnosticism is not about knowledge, it is about religious belief

24 September 2005

• 17:0617:06, 24 September 2005 diff hist +3,143‎ Agnosticism ‎ As Huxley points out, agnostics are those who deny and repudiate any doctrine like Christianity or Islam for example

31 August 2005

• 22:4522:45, 31 August 2005 diff hist +363‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎ →‎I am out of here
• 22:3622:36, 31 August 2005 diff hist +1,112‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎No edit summary
• 22:1122:11, 31 August 2005 diff hist +845‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Proposed decision ‎ A free society is a place where it's safe to be unpopular. -- Adlai Stevenson, statesman (1900-1965)

30 August 2005

• 17:2817:28, 30 August 2005 diff hist +421‎ Talk:Freethought ‎ Freethinkers Unite!

28 August 2005

• 17:3317:33, 28 August 2005 diff hist −3,406‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You have been caught in a lie, just like that moron, Nate Ladd. Now get lost, moron.
• 17:0317:03, 28 August 2005 diff hist −3,406‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ See someone about that lying problem of yours. Theresa knott said, "OK ... Moving it there is fine."
• 16:4916:49, 28 August 2005 diff hist −3,406‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You are a liiar, Theresa knott said, "OK. ... Moving it there is fine" Are you on the committee?
• 06:4906:49, 28 August 2005 diff hist −2‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ →‎Freethinkers' list of things to do as an alternative to being one of Banno's sheep
• 06:4706:47, 28 August 2005 diff hist +112‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎No edit summary
• 06:1106:11, 28 August 2005 diff hist +700‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ →‎tasks for when the article is unlocked...
• 05:3205:32, 28 August 2005 diff hist +25‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ →‎Donald R. Alford claims to be 67.182.157.6. He is an impostor, obviously.

27 August 2005

• 22:0222:02, 27 August 2005 diff hist +260‎ User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ →‎Crisis
• 21:3721:37, 27 August 2005 diff hist +55‎ User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ →‎Crisis
• 21:2121:21, 27 August 2005 diff hist −1,614‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ Stop the lame revert battling. Theresa knott okayed the move of my comment to /Workshop. See it there.
• 19:1619:16, 27 August 2005 diff hist +374‎ Talk:Knowledge ‎ →‎Knowledge (Info Science / Knowledge Management)
• 19:1319:13, 27 August 2005 diff hist +453‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ →‎[[Gettier problem|Gettier's]] counterexamples
• 18:5418:54, 27 August 2005 diff hist +85‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ Well DUH!
• 18:4718:47, 27 August 2005 diff hist −1,614‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ Stop the lame reverting. Theresa okayed the move of my comment to /Workshop. See it there.
• 16:2716:27, 27 August 2005 diff hist +1,860‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎ Nate Ladd is a big fat liar.
• 15:3415:34, 27 August 2005 diff hist −1,614‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You cannot force someone to be a party to a request for arbitration, it is strictly voluntary.

26 August 2005

• 23:3723:37, 26 August 2005 diff hist −1,810‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/DotSix/Workshop#General_discussion]. That is where I moved the content that belongs to me, not you.
• 22:4722:47, 26 August 2005 diff hist −2,213‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ I didn't REmove it, moron, I MOVED content that I wrote to where it should be, in the 'other' category. Is there something about the term 'MOVED' that you do not understand?
• 22:4222:42, 26 August 2005 diff hist +1,176‎ User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ →‎The vatican's Media Conference and the Wikipedia
• 21:4821:48, 26 August 2005 diff hist −2,213‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ I took a statement I wrote and moved it somewhere other than where Ladd moved it. That's not blanking, moron.
• 19:5519:55, 26 August 2005 diff hist −2,213‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ →‎Statement by party 1
• 18:2318:23, 26 August 2005 diff hist +1,117‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎ →‎General discussion
• 07:1107:11, 26 August 2005 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎No edit summary
• 07:0607:06, 26 August 2005 diff hist +4,378‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Workshop ‎ →‎Template

24 August 2005

• 23:3423:34, 24 August 2005 diff hist −279‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Evidence ‎ Nate Ladd says, "67.182.157.6 now explicitly admits that he is Donald Alford." That is a lie, I admit no such thing.
• 23:3423:34, 24 August 2005 diff hist −677‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You cannot force me to be a party to something to which I refuse to be a party. Check with your legal council. Stop listing me as a party to this request for arbitration. I refuse to be so listed.
• 23:1423:14, 24 August 2005 diff hist +3,619‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ →‎Deconstructing the above disingenuous reply in which ChristoFurious demonstrates how to act like a truely remarkable Sesquipedalian Obscurantist
• 22:0222:02, 24 August 2005 diff hist +214‎ Obscurantism ‎No edit summary
• 21:3421:34, 24 August 2005 diff hist +304‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) ‎ Banno and the obscurantists are still trying to control content by force of numbers
• 21:2321:23, 24 August 2005 diff hist +1,231‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) ‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration is being used as a tribunal - that ain't right
• 20:5620:56, 24 August 2005 diff hist −4‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive9 ‎ →‎[[User:67.182.157.6]] <lie deleted>
• 20:3520:35, 24 August 2005 diff hist −677‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You cannot force me to be a party to something to which I refuse to be a party. Check with your legal council. Stop listing me as a party to this request for arbitration. I refuse to be so listed.
• 20:3220:32, 24 August 2005 diff hist −279‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Evidence ‎ Nate Ladd says, "67.182.157.6 now explicitly admits that he is Donald Alford." That is a lie, I admit no such thing.
• 18:3118:31, 24 August 2005 diff hist −677‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You cannot force me to be a party to something to which I refuse to be a party. Check with your legal council. Stop listing me as a party to this request for arbitration. I refuse to be so listed.
• 18:2918:29, 24 August 2005 diff hist −279‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Evidence ‎ Nate Ladd shows himself to be a big fat liar.
• 16:3916:39, 24 August 2005 diff hist −279‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix/Evidence ‎ Nate Ladd shows himself to be a big fat liar.
• 16:3516:35, 24 August 2005 diff hist −677‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix ‎ You cannot force me to be a party to something to which I refuse to be a party. Check with your legal council. Stop listing me as a party to this request for arbitration. I refuse to be so listed.
• 16:2216:22, 24 August 2005 diff hist −1,487‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ Your argument _ad hominem_ does not qualify as evidence, moron, it is just logical fallacy.
• 16:1916:19, 24 August 2005 diff hist +1,919‎ Talk:Epistemology ‎ Give up trying to equate belief with knowledge, it's logical fallacy.
• 15:3415:34, 24 August 2005 diff hist +375‎ Talk:Knowledge ‎ →‎Section deleted
• 15:1315:13, 24 August 2005 diff hist −1,487‎ User talk:67.182.157.6 ‎ I get to take a break just about every other day, when somebody on your side blocks me for 24