User contributions for 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534

This IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

15:16, 14 March 2024 Drmies talk contribs changed block settings for 2603:6000:b800:eb4::/64 talk with an expiration time of 14:56, 14 September 2024 (anon. only, account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Block evasion; returned to the same editing immediately after expiration of previous block)

This IP address is currently globally blocked. If the block is marked as locally disabled, this means that it applies on other sites, but a local administrator has decided to disable it on this wiki. The global block log entry is provided below for reference:

15:50, 14 March 2024: Hoo man (meta.wikimedia.org) globally blocked 2603:6000:B800:EB4:0:0:0:0/64 (global block log) (expires on 14 March 2025 at 15:50) (Cross-wiki abuse)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

16:5316:53, 28 October 2023 diff hist +363‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply

21:5521:55, 27 October 2023 diff hist +250‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:5421:54, 27 October 2023 diff hist +474‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:5221:52, 27 October 2023 diff hist +309‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:5121:51, 27 October 2023 diff hist +292‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:2421:24, 27 October 2023 diff hist +374‎ User talk:Masem ‎ →‎Final statement for now.: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
21:1721:17, 27 October 2023 diff hist +402‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:1221:12, 27 October 2023 diff hist +379‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:1121:11, 27 October 2023 diff hist +621‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21:0221:02, 27 October 2023 diff hist +706‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:5320:53, 27 October 2023 diff hist +344‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:5220:52, 27 October 2023 diff hist +287‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:4220:42, 27 October 2023 diff hist +289‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:3820:38, 27 October 2023 diff hist +385‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:3520:35, 27 October 2023 diff hist +376‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20:3220:32, 27 October 2023 diff hist +1,503‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19:3619:36, 27 October 2023 diff hist +543‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19:3219:32, 27 October 2023 diff hist +364‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19:2419:24, 27 October 2023 diff hist +497‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19:2019:20, 27 October 2023 diff hist +633‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19:1519:15, 27 October 2023 diff hist +332‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
17:1417:14, 27 October 2023 diff hist +388‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
16:1916:19, 27 October 2023 diff hist +1,731‎ User talk:Masem ‎ →‎Regarding sources for the film (this is not a spam attempt if this was seen on the films talk page I am making sure the word is known and spread.): new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
16:0316:03, 27 October 2023 diff hist +1,692‎ User talk:EvergreenFir ‎ →‎(This is not a spam attempt I am making sure the word gets out regarding sources I've found for the film.): new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic

22:3322:33, 26 October 2023 diff hist +358‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
22:3222:32, 26 October 2023 diff hist +310‎ User talk:EvergreenFir ‎ →‎Why was my edit for the film removed?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
22:2222:22, 26 October 2023 diff hist +1,582‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
22:2022:20, 26 October 2023 diff hist +1,494‎ Talk:Megamind ‎ →‎Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
22:1922:19, 26 October 2023 diff hist +1,483‎ User talk:EvergreenFir ‎ →‎Why was my edit for the film removed?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply

28 October 2023

27 October 2023

26 October 2023