Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
1 June 2024
- diffhist CBS 19:09 −63 Snowyjamster talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:59 +13 Primium talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added ore-existing shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Getaway (TV series) 09:10 +6,433 TechGeek105 talk contribs (Added/managed references about Getaway, removed un-cited information, added additional information about the history of the program, minor ce and corrected information per added sources.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Australia 05:38 −164 Moxy talk contribs (Restored revision 1226554575 by Moxy (talk)) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist m Australia 05:34 +6 Zakary2012 talk contribs Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist m Australia 05:32 −29 Zakary2012 talk contribs Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added
- diffhist Australia 05:20 +187 Zakary2012 talk contribs (Added regional languages) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist m Fox Broadcasting Company 04:23 −191 Geraldo Perez talk contribs (Reverted edit by 2600:8801:3:D800:F05A:C3F3:10F7:311F (talk) to last version by Wcquidditch) Tag: Rollback
31 May 2024
- diffhist Getaway (TV series) 22:38 +2 Eyesnore talk contribs (→top) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Australia 11:33 −348 Moxy talk contribs (→top: not the place for random list with no cont xt)
- diffhist Australia 11:28 −82 Nickm57 talk contribs (Undid revision 1226553755 by Zakary2012 (talk)Read the previous discussion (in the archive) and take your ideas to the talk page. This is a courtesy to other editors as well as an acknowledgement of the many previous discussions about it.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Australia 11:23 +82 Zakary2012 talk contribs (Added the Royal anthem. The Royal anthem should not be removed from the Infobox as it is one of Australia's symbols of identity. Removing the Royal anthem is a purely political act of Australian republicanism. The Royal anthem is currently one of Australia's symbols of identity therefore should stay in the Infobox until that changes.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Australia 10:01 −85 Aemilius Adolphin talk contribs (Undid revision 1226544370 by Zakary2012 (talk)Need consensus for this. Please see discussion on Talk.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Australia 10:00 +349 Zakary2012 talk contribs (Added largest minority languages. I couldn't put a citation in but here is the link to where I found my info: https://www.google.com/search?q=main+languages+in+australia+other+than+english&client=safari&sca_esv=52387aaaa078a480&sca_upv=1&hl=en-au&sxsrf=ADLYWIIqmomqSHsZMEgxz1Fskg8Wuk7iIg%3A1717148891171&ei=25xZZteRCtzPseMP47G3oA8&oq=main+languages+in+australia+other+than+english&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIi5tYWluIGxhbmd1YWdlcyBpbiBhdXN0cmFsaWEgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBlbmdsaXNoMgQQIxgnMggQABiABBiiB) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added
- diffhist Australia 09:45 +96 Zakary2012 talk contribs (Added detail about what the different independence events mean) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Australia 09:37 +85 Zakary2012 talk contribs (Added Royal anthem) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Seven Network 06:59 −34 202.7.251.108 talk (→Programming)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
30 May 2024
- diffhist Australia 20:10 +300 Moxy talk contribs (→Ancestry and immigration: <ref name="x195">{{cite web | title=Understanding and using Ancestry data | website=Australian Bureau of Statistics | date=Jun 28, 2022 | url=https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/detailed-methodology-information/information-papers/understanding-and-using-ancestry-data | access-date=May 30, 2024}}</ref>)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:40 −20 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1226458510 by WhatamIdoing (talk) This is a paraphrase of Jimmy Wales 2002 statement and the notion of reliable sources was not discussed at that time.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Australia 12:30 +4 Mitch Ames talk contribs (in the absence of any apparent reason to the contrary, I've converted {{efn}} to {{refn}} so that there is a single enumeration of notes, instead of two)
- diffhist Australia 12:26 +93 Mitch Ames talk contribs (→Ancestry and immigration: add note, per Talk:Australia#Ancestry_and_immigration)
29 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:53 +21 Dave souza talk contribs (Undid revision 1226310338 by Dave souza (talk) undo own revert) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:50 −21 Dave souza talk contribs (Reverted edit by Dustfreeworld (talk) to last version by Cambalachero) Tags: Rollback Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:34 +21 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Copied three words from the section below.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Fox Broadcasting Company 18:54 +191 2600:8801:3:d800:f05a:c3f3:10f7:311f talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 18:16 −249 Schierbecker talk contribs (→When and why to cite sources: Alright, but this passage is in the completely wrong section)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 17:35 +251 David Eppstein talk contribs (Undid revision 1226261696 by Schierbecker (talk) undiscussed changes. DYK exception is necessary to prevent us from having conflicting guidelines: this one saying repeat citations in a single passage are forbidden, and DYK rules saying they are required.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:49 −251 Schierbecker talk contribs (→When and why to cite sources: move to relevant passage. DYK exception is overkill.) Tag: Reverted
28 May 2024
- diffhist Fox Broadcasting Company 04:13 −308 Wcquidditch talk contribs (Reverted 2 edits by 2600:8801:3:D800:9929:64D9:B604:966B (talk): Even that is probably a bit much) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Fox Broadcasting Company 03:48 +33 2600:8801:3:d800:9929:64d9:b604:966b talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Fox Broadcasting Company 03:35 +275 2600:8801:3:d800:9929:64d9:b604:966b talk Tag: Reverted
27 May 2024
- diffhist Australia 22:10 −129 Aemilius Adolphin talk contribs (Royal Anthem is already in note 2 and is infrequently used. This has been discussed in Talk. Please see that discussion.) Tags: Manual revert Visual edit
- diffhist Australia 21:26 +27 Arimaboss talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Australia 21:22 +102 Arimaboss talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist m VH1 20:45 0 Rfl0216 talk contribs (→VH1 Best Cruise Ever)
- diffhist m VH1 20:44 0 Rfl0216 talk contribs (→Hip-Hop and Rock Honors)
- diffhist CNN 20:35 +29 Dasomm talk contribs (→Former channels)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:46 −15 Cambalachero talk contribs (→Exceptional claims require exceptional sources: Despite the superficial similarities, Wikipedia's Verifiability and actual science are two different fields with their own rules.)