User talk:NikitaSadkov

Regarding your user page

We have no control over what the Russian Wikipedia does. That's just an unfortunate fact. I have had to suppress your talk page because it was revealing personal information about the people you contacted to attempt to resolve this matter. As much as it might be difficult, you will have to find a way to get unblocked on the Russian Wikipedia without the help of the English Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 12:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just wanted to get some answer from Wikimedia Foundation, why Russian Wikipedia got out of control. Insiders told me that Russian government just pays Jimmy Wales to have control over it. I don't want to get unblocked there (Russian Wikipedia is broken beyond repair, most good people left it), I made that edit about Khattab on purpose to prove my point by getting instant ban. Regarding Russian support email ( info-ru@wikimedia.org ), they refuse giving any answer, saying just "I'm sorry, but I do not speak English, I only speak Russian." NikitaSadkov (talk) 12:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clash (video game) cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clash (video game) cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch shooting talk page

The Daily Stormer certainly won't be accepted as a source for what you posted on the Al Noor Mosque at Talk:Christchurch_mosque_shootings#Al_Noor_Mosque_Was_In_the_News_Befor. It has caused conflict with other editors. You may wish to remove it, but that's up to you. starship.paint ~ KO 03:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That DS link is already censored by NorthBySouthBaranof. But it wasn't even proposed as a source, just as an article linking to other sources, like i.e. www.stuff.co.nz/world/middle-east/10310496/A-Kiwi-lads-death-by-drone and explaining why these articles were censored from Internet. --NikitaSadkov (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita, the next time you post such comments on wikipedia; post links to DailyStormer or its ilk; treat the talkpage as a forum; or, otherwise game the latitude according for discussion on talkpages you will be blocked. Abecedare (talk) 03:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've cited my own experience chatting with Muslims from all over the world at a hostels. Most of my Muslims roommates supported the genocide of gay people and stoning adulterous wives, a lot of them support ISIS. I.e. I don't propose people to read Nazis sites, but instead going the other way around - visiting Muslims communities. If you edit articles on Islam, then knowing Quran and its followers firsthand can be beneficial, don't you find? --NikitaSadkov (talk) 13:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita, I can't see how your response here is helpful or relevant. You're on thin ice already, read the above post. For your sake, I'd advise you to remove that comment. starship.paint ~ KO 11:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'm not an ophthalmologist. --NikitaSadkov (talk) 13:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]