User talk:How dare you?: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:06, 12 August 2006

License tagging for Image:Rpi1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rpi1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rpi2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rpi2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 361

Why would you do that! --Elven6 02:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. Thank you. Ryūlóng 02:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Howdareyou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Howdareyou.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:NYSm2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NYSm2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:DSC-S600.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC-S600.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Rpi1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rpi1.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BrownCow  (how now?) 23:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Howdareyou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Howdareyou.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BrownCow  (how now?) 23:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Pindown

Hi. Just to let you know you've not quite followed process for this - you'll need to add it to today's log otherwise no-one will see it. Also, you might want to see my response to the deletion nomination, as it might alleviate your concerns. SP-KP 22:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hey, thanks for all of the support! I really appreciate the nom, the comments, it all. We'll talk in September, certainly ;).-- Rmrfstar 23:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Solarwolf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Solarwolf.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

How dare you? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell? I am a highly legitimate contributor from 67.86.88.191, an IP misused by some people in that family. I made numerous good contribs, and brought an unsuccessful but nontheless galvanizing in the matter nomination of User:Rmrfstar for adminship. Yes, I did do something haywire (the Xbox 361 move), but in the end being banished for something I didn't do is completely unfair.

Decline reason:

You created various abusive socks and admitted as such under your last account, That has continued. You also started adding some of those abusive socks to the long term abuse pages here, even going so far as to upload a screenshot of the vandalism of one of them. You have no credibility.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

How dare you? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No. I uploaded [[Image:WIC.png]] because it resembled the commie vandal and obviously stayed for a while. Also, I just for curiosity viewed User:Timothy McVeigh's contributions, and what I did with him on WP:WIC was perfectly legit. I did not use that account - if you doubt me checkuser did not find it I am sure. So if you are not going to unblock a legit user, what should I do if I am willing to make useful contributions? Oh and by the way, I was NOT the one who listed User:Railer 353 on WP:WIC and WP:WOW - feel free to check the histories of those two pages for proof. Not only that Pgk, you also blatantly reverted my last change to this page without even reading what I wrote in a response to the declined unblock. And I'm warning you right now: if you protect this page, I WILL USE A SOCKPUPPET to get through to you.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No.  I uploaded [[Image:WIC.png]] because it resembled the commie vandal and obviously stayed for a while.  Also, I just for curiosity viewed [[User:Timothy McVeigh]]'s contributions, and what I did with him on [[WP:WIC]] was perfectly legit.  I did not use that account - if you doubt me checkuser did not find it I am sure.  So if you are not going to unblock a legit user, what should I do if I am willing to make useful contributions?  Oh and by the way, I was NOT the one who listed [[User:Railer 353]] on [[WP:WIC]] and [[WP:WOW]] - feel free to check the histories of those two pages for proof.  Not only that Pgk, you also blatantly reverted my last change to this page without even reading what I wrote in a response to the declined unblock.  And I'm warning you right now: if you protect this page, I WILL USE A SOCKPUPPET to get through to you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No.  I uploaded [[Image:WIC.png]] because it resembled the commie vandal and obviously stayed for a while.  Also, I just for curiosity viewed [[User:Timothy McVeigh]]'s contributions, and what I did with him on [[WP:WIC]] was perfectly legit.  I did not use that account - if you doubt me checkuser did not find it I am sure.  So if you are not going to unblock a legit user, what should I do if I am willing to make useful contributions?  Oh and by the way, I was NOT the one who listed [[User:Railer 353]] on [[WP:WIC]] and [[WP:WOW]] - feel free to check the histories of those two pages for proof.  Not only that Pgk, you also blatantly reverted my last change to this page without even reading what I wrote in a response to the declined unblock.  And I'm warning you right now: if you protect this page, I WILL USE A SOCKPUPPET to get through to you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No.  I uploaded [[Image:WIC.png]] because it resembled the commie vandal and obviously stayed for a while.  Also, I just for curiosity viewed [[User:Timothy McVeigh]]'s contributions, and what I did with him on [[WP:WIC]] was perfectly legit.  I did not use that account - if you doubt me checkuser did not find it I am sure.  So if you are not going to unblock a legit user, what should I do if I am willing to make useful contributions?  Oh and by the way, I was NOT the one who listed [[User:Railer 353]] on [[WP:WIC]] and [[WP:WOW]] - feel free to check the histories of those two pages for proof.  Not only that Pgk, you also blatantly reverted my last change to this page without even reading what I wrote in a response to the declined unblock.  And I'm warning you right now: if you protect this page, I WILL USE A SOCKPUPPET to get through to you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I reverted as for this, your removal of a denied unblock request. You also seem to be getting your socks in a mess such as [1]. Which was created a few days ago. Face reality you have a history of abusive socking. --pgk^(talk) 19:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well given how legit accounts are being blocked and legit changes are being reverted, what should I do? --How dare you? 19:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted that was created long before this was block. Interesting legitimate edit to the user page of that user also. --pgk^(talk) 19:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you a question that you didn't answer: WHAT SHOULD I DO? --How dare you? 19:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User:Timothy McVeigh, sure just a coincidence edits like this and the sock which 100% certainly was created by User:NicAgent here. You still have to explain why User:NicAgent was creating attack account for users with whom it had no interaction, whist simultaneously the abusive socks were again by coincidence also attacking those users. --pgk^(talk) 20:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no explanation. My best advice is to create Wikipedia:Long term abuse/NicAgent and get it all stored. Also, is it possible the police are gonna show up at my door and arrest me for abuse on Wikipedia? --How dare you? 20:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:02, 12 August 2006 edit Pgk (talk \| contribs) 20,534 edits →‎Unblock ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:06, 12 August 2006 edit undo How dare you? (talk \| contribs) 168 edits →‎Unblock Next edit →
Line 96:		Line 96:

	:: Regarding [[User:Timothy McVeigh]], sure just a coincidence edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pgk&diff=prev&oldid=67136408 this] and the sock which 100% certainly was created by [[User:NicAgent]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pgk&diff=prev&oldid=67136408 here]. You still have to explain why [[User:NicAgent]] was creating attack account for users with whom it had no interaction, whist simultaneously the abusive socks were again by coincidence also attacking those users. --[[User:Pgk\|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk\|talk]]</font>)</sup> 20:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)		:: Regarding [[User:Timothy McVeigh]], sure just a coincidence edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pgk&diff=prev&oldid=67136408 this] and the sock which 100% certainly was created by [[User:NicAgent]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pgk&diff=prev&oldid=67136408 here]. You still have to explain why [[User:NicAgent]] was creating attack account for users with whom it had no interaction, whist simultaneously the abusive socks were again by coincidence also attacking those users. --[[User:Pgk\|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk\|talk]]</font>)</sup> 20:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

			:I have no explanation. My best advice is to create [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/NicAgent]] and get it all stored. Also, is it possible the police are gonna show up at my door and arrest me for abuse on [[Wikipedia]]? --[[User:How dare you?\|How dare you?]] 20:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)