Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol: Difference between revisions
→Learning to rate new articles: new section |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
New pages patrolling seems to have been enabled. So now you can mark a page as patrolled, making it easier for new page patrollers to coordinate patrolling. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC) |
New pages patrolling seems to have been enabled. So now you can mark a page as patrolled, making it easier for new page patrollers to coordinate patrolling. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I think this should be reflected in the text of this page as well. [[User:Huji|huji]]—[[User_talk:Huji|<small>TALK</small>]] 08:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
:I think this should be reflected in the text of this page as well. [[User:Huji|huji]]—[[User_talk:Huji|<small>TALK</small>]] 08:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Learning to rate new articles == |
|||
I've been a vandal patroller for a long time. Now I think I'll help out with New pages patrol - but it's a lot harder. I've read [[WP:CSD]], etc. but many articles are judgment calls and judgment is something that takes time to develop. What I'd like to do is list some pages that I patrolled and ask the experts why they rated {{tl|db-bio}}, {{tl|notability}}, or a pass. Here's the first one: [[Ralph Pulitzer]]. At the very least it should get an {{tl|unreferenced}}, but does it deserve db-bio or a notability tag or any other tags? [[User:Sbowers3|Sbowers3]] ([[User talk:Sbowers3|talk]]) 03:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:15, 19 November 2007
Wondering why Special:Newpages is yellow all of a sudden? See here for full details about this cool new feature. |
How do you sign up?
how do you sign up for the new pages patrol User: Physik
- Hi, sorry, but since your comment wasn't in a section, I put it in one for you. Thanks! --HAL2008 05:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Stubs and short non-stubs
I've come here at the suggestion of another editor on the WikiProject Cricket Talk page (section heading: "I can't win!"). The discussion there was provoked by the fact that a short biographical article I wrote about a cricketer, William Adshead, had a stub tag added to it just a few minutes after I submitted it. There is a fair consensus in the WikiProject that articles such as Adshead's are not actually stubs despite their brevity: there are many cricketers about whom not that much is known, yet who pass the standards for notability (which in the case of cricketers means having played at first-class or List A level). Adshead is one of those, and since all the available significant details are already covered in his article, it shouldn't really be classed as a stub even though it's not all that long. Loganberry (Talk) 21:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Volunteering
I'm volunterringmy efforts, let me know if I should report that on a different page :) Mathiastck 10:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
"It is advisable to patrol new pages from the bottom of the first page of the log."
Does anyone actually do this? I could cite dozens of examples of pages that got littered with tags (especially speedy tags) within minutes of creation. Morgan Wick 17:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I do it (I added it to the page). The idea is it can be bitish to speedy a page created in good faith within one or two minutes of creation. Vandalism and obvious garbage I don't wait for.--Chaser - T 17:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Does anyone else? Morgan Wick 05:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm doing that, but I just started doing new page patrol a few days ago, qualifying me as a newbie.--Evil1987 19:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Does anyone else? Morgan Wick 05:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi I created this bot to make reports here of users removing speedy tag on articles they created, I'm just waiting on approval for a trial run. --Chris g 11:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Proposal to add 10 day delay into A7 CSD process
There is discussion about adding a ten day delay into the A7 CSD process, since that would affect this wiki project significantly, I am posting a link to the discussion to obtain wider input from the community. --Fredrick day 14:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Proposal to add 10 day delay into A7 CSD process
[WikiEN-l] Anonymous page creation will be reenabled on English Wikipedia
From the mailing list:
“ | In the time since late 2005 the English Wikipedia community has grown substantially. The nearly exponential growth rate in articles we
previously experienced has stopped. Even if disabling anon page creation was beneficial then, there is no current evidence suggesting that the change continues to be beneficial. As such, barring complications, anonymous page creation will be re-enabled on English Wikipedia on Friday November 9th. After a one month period, on December 9th, we will re-evaluate this decision using previously established methods (average article lifespan, rate of deletion, manual quality classification, random samplings of newly created articles, and most importantly, community discussion). If there is evidence of harm, anonymous page creation will be disabled to collect more data and provide time for discussion. If there is no significant evidence of harm, the issue will be evaluated again after six months. Further milestones and actions may be proposed at that time. |
” |
Original post: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html . Better optimize those speedy deletion scripts, we're going to need them a lot more.
Discussion to WP:VPP#Anonymous page creation will be reenabled on English Wikipedia please. MER-C 09:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Patrolling enabled
New pages patrolling seems to have been enabled. So now you can mark a page as patrolled, making it easier for new page patrollers to coordinate patrolling. Thue | talk 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think this should be reflected in the text of this page as well. huji—TALK 08:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Learning to rate new articles
I've been a vandal patroller for a long time. Now I think I'll help out with New pages patrol - but it's a lot harder. I've read WP:CSD, etc. but many articles are judgment calls and judgment is something that takes time to develop. What I'd like to do is list some pages that I patrolled and ask the experts why they rated {{db-bio}}, {{notability}}, or a pass. Here's the first one: Ralph Pulitzer. At the very least it should get an {{unreferenced}}, but does it deserve db-bio or a notability tag or any other tags? Sbowers3 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)