User talk:TimothyBlue: Difference between revisions
TimothyBlue (talk | contribs) a |
→Arbitation enforcement warning: new topic (CD) Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | '''30% Resigned, 50% Pissed off, 20% Disgusted'''<br>Overall bad mood. Taking a semi-wikibreak. |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | '''30% Resigned, 50% Pissed off, 20% Disgusted'''<br>Overall bad mood. Taking a semi-wikibreak. |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Arbitation enforcement warning == |
|||
Your [[WP:EW|edit warring]] at [[Sexual violence in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]] is not acceptable nor is [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=1133637280&oldid=1133634992 this comment] where you indicate a willingness to continue [[WP:BATTLE|edit warring]]. Using an {{tl|in use}} tag does not mean you are exempt from the edit warring policy. Continuing to edit war or edit with a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground mentality]] will likely result in you receiving extended blocks and/or topic bans. This warning is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe|this arbitration decision]] and the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. This warning has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2023|log of sanctions]]. You may appeal this warning using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]] using the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]]. Even if you appeal this warning, it remains in place until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 05:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:22, 15 January 2023
|
Welcome to my Talk Page | |
| If we have a difference of opinion, I'm open to discussing it if the issue is meaningful, significant and worth my time. I ignore comments containing hyperbole, profanity, nonsense, attacks, and attitudes/behaviors I personally find offensive; I also ignore ones that I don't think are worth the time to respond. If you do not like this, click here. I have very strong feelings about the importance of notability, policies and guidelines, sources and evidence. Best wishes from Los Angeles, // Timothy :: talk |
| This is TimothyBlue's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello TimothyBlue,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
Arbitration
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Status
|
Current Status | |
| 30% Resigned, 50% Pissed off, 20% Disgusted Overall bad mood. Taking a semi-wikibreak. |
Arbitation enforcement warning
Your edit warring at Sexual violence in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is not acceptable nor is this comment where you indicate a willingness to continue edit warring. Using an {{in use}} tag does not mean you are exempt from the edit warring policy. Continuing to edit war or edit with a battleground mentality will likely result in you receiving extended blocks and/or topic bans. This warning is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of this arbitration decision and the procedure described at Wikipedia:Contentious topics. This warning has been recorded in the log of sanctions. You may appeal this warning using the process described here using the arbitration enforcement appeals template. Even if you appeal this warning, it remains in place until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)