Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[Patch 6/6] Bind Mount Extensions 0.06

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Herbert Poetzl

unread,
Feb 22, 2005, 7:30:08 AM2/22/05
to

;
; Bind Mount Extensions
;
; This part adds appropriate vfsmount checks (regarding ro)
; in various places like: report_statvfs*, *_ioctl, *utime*,
; *chmod*, and *permission (wherever RDONLY is verified)
;
; Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Herbert Pötzl <her...@13thfloor.at>
;
; Changelog:
;
; 0.01 - broken out part from bme0.05
;
; this patch is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
; modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
; as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
; of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
;
; this patch is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
; GNU General Public License for more details.
;

diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2004-12-25 01:54:50 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int report_statvfs(struct vfsmoun
int j = strlen (p);

if (j > 15) j = 15;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;
if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
return -EOVERFLOW;
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int report_statvfs64(struct vfsmo
int j = strlen (p);

if (j > 15) j = 15;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;
if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
return -EOVERFLOW;
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:54 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
unsigned int oldflags;

- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
@@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
case EXT2_IOC_SETVERSION:
if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
return -EPERM;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;
if (get_user(inode->i_generation, (int __user *) arg))
return -EFAULT;
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/ext3/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext3/ioctl.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/ext3/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:54 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext3/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ int ext3_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
unsigned int oldflags;
unsigned int jflag;

- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
@@ -111,7 +112,8 @@ flags_err:

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
return -EPERM;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;
if (get_user(generation, (int __user *) arg))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -162,7 +164,8 @@ flags_err:
if (!test_opt(inode->i_sb, RESERVATION) ||!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return -ENOTTY;

- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
@@ -183,7 +186,8 @@ flags_err:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
return -EPERM;

- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if (get_user(n_blocks_count, (__u32 __user *)arg))
@@ -204,7 +208,8 @@ flags_err:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
return -EPERM;

- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if (copy_from_user(&input, (struct ext3_new_group_input __user *)arg,
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:55 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ int hfsplus_ioctl(struct inode *inode, s
flags |= EXT2_FLAG_NODUMP; /* EXT2_NODUMP_FL */
return put_user(flags, (int __user *)arg);
case HFSPLUS_IOC_EXT2_SETFLAGS: {
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:31:50 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int permission(struct inode *inode, int
/*
* Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
*/
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
+ if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
(S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
return -EROFS;

@@ -1307,7 +1307,8 @@ int may_open(struct nameidata *nd, int a
return -EACCES;

flag &= ~O_TRUNC;
- } else if (IS_RDONLY(inode) && (flag & FMODE_WRITE))
+ } else if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt)))
+ && (flag & FMODE_WRITE))
return -EROFS;
/*
* An append-only file must be opened in append mode for writing.
@@ -2228,6 +2229,9 @@ static inline int do_rename(const char *
error = -EINVAL;
if (old_dentry == trap)
goto exit4;
+ error = -EROFS;
+ if (MNT_IS_RDONLY(newnd.mnt))
+ goto exit4;
new_dentry = lookup_hash(&newnd.last, new_dir);
error = PTR_ERR(new_dentry);
if (IS_ERR(new_dentry))
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-13 17:16:55 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *
if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
return 0;
/* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
- if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
+ if ((IS_RDONLY(dir) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
+ (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
return 0;
return 1;
}
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfsd/vfs.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfsd/vfs.c 2005-02-13 17:16:58 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfsd/vfs.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -1734,7 +1734,8 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_export *exp,
*/
if (!(acc & MAY_LOCAL_ACCESS))
if (acc & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_SATTR | MAY_TRUNC)) {
- if (EX_RDONLY(exp) || IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (EX_RDONLY(exp) || IS_RDONLY(inode)
+ || (exp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(exp->ex_mnt)))
return nfserr_rofs;
if (/* (acc & MAY_WRITE) && */ IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
return nfserr_perm;
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/open.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/open.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/open.c 2005-02-19 06:31:43 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/open.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline long do_sys_truncate(const
goto dput_and_out;

error = -EROFS;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
goto dput_and_out;

error = -EPERM;
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_utime(char __user *
inode = nd.dentry->d_inode;

error = -EROFS;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
goto dput_and_out;

/* Don't worry, the checks are done in inode_change_ok() */
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ long do_utimes(char __user * filename, s
inode = nd.dentry->d_inode;

error = -EROFS;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
goto dput_and_out;

/* Don't worry, the checks are done in inode_change_ok() */
@@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_access(const char __
if (!res) {
res = permission(nd.dentry->d_inode, mode, &nd);
/* SuS v2 requires we report a read only fs too */
- if(!res && (mode & S_IWOTH) && IS_RDONLY(nd.dentry->d_inode)
+ if(!res && (mode & S_IWOTH)
+ && (IS_RDONLY(nd.dentry->d_inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
&& !special_file(nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
res = -EROFS;
path_release(&nd);
@@ -608,7 +609,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_fchmod(unsigned int
inode = dentry->d_inode;

err = -EROFS;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (file && MNT_IS_RDONLY(file->f_vfsmnt)))
goto out_putf;
err = -EPERM;
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
@@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_chmod(const char __u
inode = nd.dentry->d_inode;

error = -EROFS;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
goto dput_and_out;

error = -EPERM;
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
i_attrs_to_sd_attrs( inode, ( __u16 * ) &flags );
return put_user(flags, (int __user *) arg);
case REISERFS_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;

if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
@@ -72,7 +73,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
case REISERFS_IOC_SETVERSION:
if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
return -EPERM;
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
+ (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
return -EROFS;
if (get_user(inode->i_generation, (int __user *) arg))
return -EFAULT;
diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ __reiserfs_permission (struct inode *ino
/*
* Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
*/
- if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
+ if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
(S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
return -EROFS;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Trond Myklebust

unread,
Feb 22, 2005, 9:40:08 AM2/22/05
to
ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
>
> diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-13 17:16:55 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *
> if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
> return 0;
> /* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
> - if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
> + if ((IS_RDONLY(dir) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> + (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
> return 0;
> return 1;
> }

The check for nd != NULL is redundant. See 5 lines further up...

Cheers,
Trond

--
Trond Myklebust <trond.m...@fys.uio.no>

Herbert Poetzl

unread,
Feb 22, 2005, 9:50:12 AM2/22/05
to
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:34:31AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
> >
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-13 17:16:55 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/nfs/dir.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *
> > if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
> > return 0;
> > /* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
> > + if ((IS_RDONLY(dir) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> > + (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
> > return 0;
> > return 1;
> > }
>
> The check for nd != NULL is redundant. See 5 lines further up...

indeed, thanks!

Trond Myklebust

unread,
Feb 22, 2005, 10:10:11 AM2/22/05
to
ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:

> diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2004-12-25 01:54:50 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int report_statvfs(struct vfsmoun
> int j = strlen (p);
>
> if (j > 15) j = 15;
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;

Redundant check of mnt != NULL.

> if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
> if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
> return -EOVERFLOW;
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int report_statvfs64(struct vfsmo
> int j = strlen (p);
>
> if (j > 15) j = 15;
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;

Redundant check of mnt != NULL

> if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
> if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
> return -EOVERFLOW;

> diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:31:50 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int permission(struct inode *inode, int
> /*
> * Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
> */
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
> + if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> (S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
> return -EROFS;

This is very dodgy. What if the user is calling permission without
setting the (currently optional) nameidata hint? Have you audited the
kernel to find out if this is safe?

Redundant check of file != NULL.

> err = -EPERM;
> if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
> @@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_chmod(const char __u
> inode = nd.dentry->d_inode;
>
> error = -EROFS;
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
> goto dput_and_out;
>
> error = -EPERM;
> diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
> i_attrs_to_sd_attrs( inode, ( __u16 * ) &flags );
> return put_user(flags, (int __user *) arg);
> case REISERFS_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
> return -EROFS;

Redundant check for filp != NULL



> if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
> @@ -72,7 +73,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
> case REISERFS_IOC_SETVERSION:
> if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
> return -EPERM;
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
> return -EROFS;

Redundant check for filp != NULL

> if (get_user(inode->i_generation, (int __user *) arg))
> return -EFAULT;
> diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ __reiserfs_permission (struct inode *ino
> /*
> * Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
> */
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
> + if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> (S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
> return -EROFS;

See comment above for fs/namei.c:permission().

Cheers,
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust <trond.m...@fys.uio.no>

-

Herbert Poetzl

unread,
Feb 23, 2005, 3:10:08 PM2/23/05
to
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:58:45AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
>
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2004-12-25 01:54:50 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int report_statvfs(struct vfsmoun
> > int j = strlen (p);
> >
> > if (j > 15) j = 15;
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;
>
> Redundant check of mnt != NULL.

yep,



> > if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
> > if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
> > return -EOVERFLOW;
> > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int report_statvfs64(struct vfsmo
> > int j = strlen (p);
> >
> > if (j > 15) j = 15;
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode)) i = 1;
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || (mnt && MNT_IS_RDONLY(mnt))) i = 1;
>
> Redundant check of mnt != NULL

agreed, thanks!

> > if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) i |= 2;
> > if (!sysv_valid_dev(inode->i_sb->s_dev))
> > return -EOVERFLOW;
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:31:50 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/namei.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int permission(struct inode *inode, int
> > /*
> > * Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
> > */
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
> > + if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> > (S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
> > return -EROFS;
>
> This is very dodgy. What if the user is calling permission without
> setting the (currently optional) nameidata hint? Have you audited the
> kernel to find out if this is safe?

safe yes, aybe not 'correct' I agree that moving
the check 'upwards' into the callers might be
the better solution here, will look into it ...

ack!

> > err = -EPERM;
> > if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
> > @@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_chmod(const char __u
> > inode = nd.dentry->d_inode;
> >
> > error = -EROFS;
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) || MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd.mnt))
> > goto dput_and_out;
> >
> > error = -EPERM;
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
> > i_attrs_to_sd_attrs( inode, ( __u16 * ) &flags );
> > return put_user(flags, (int __user *) arg);
> > case REISERFS_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> > + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
> > return -EROFS;
>
> Redundant check for filp != NULL

hum, don't see that one?

> > if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
> > @@ -72,7 +73,8 @@ int reiserfs_ioctl (struct inode * inode
> > case REISERFS_IOC_SETVERSION:
> > if ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
> > return -EPERM;
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> > + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
> > return -EROFS;
>
> Redundant check for filp != NULL

same here ...

> > if (get_user(inode->i_generation, (int __user *) arg))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-13 17:16:59 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ __reiserfs_permission (struct inode *ino
> > /*
> > * Nobody gets write access to a read-only fs.
> > */
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode) &&
> > + if ((IS_RDONLY(inode) || (nd && MNT_IS_RDONLY(nd->mnt))) &&
> > (S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
> > return -EROFS;
>
> See comment above for fs/namei.c:permission().

see answer above ;)

thanks for your time,
Herbert

Christoph Hellwig

unread,
Feb 23, 2005, 6:30:17 PM2/23/05
to
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
> case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> unsigned int oldflags;
>
> - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))

doing this in every filesystem ->ioctl is a really bad idea. We need to
add common handling for ext2-style file attributes first.

Also please add a file_readonly() helper - when introduced it only checks
IS_RDONLY(file->f_dentry->d_inode) and once you add per-mount flags it
only needs to be added in a single place. Actually probably a lowelevel
one taking inode,vfsmount and wrappers for a struct file * or
struct nameidata * which would cover most of the cases.

Herbert Poetzl

unread,
Feb 24, 2005, 4:40:13 PM2/24/05
to
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:06:59PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> > @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
> > case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> > unsigned int oldflags;
> >
> > - if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> > + if (IS_RDONLY(inode) ||
> > + (filp && MNT_IS_RDONLY(filp->f_vfsmnt)))
>
> doing this in every filesystem ->ioctl is a really bad idea. We need to
> add common handling for ext2-style file attributes first.

hmm, well, but the ioctls are somewhat mixed, i.e.
some of them do just read (only) like operations,
others do change stuff, and the test is just valid
for write/change ioctls ...

of course I could add a second switch/case block
which checks for 'write' type ioctls and blocks
them in the beginning ...

but maybe I did misunderstood your comment, so let
me know what you consider appropriate ...

> Also please add a file_readonly() helper - when introduced it only checks
> IS_RDONLY(file->f_dentry->d_inode) and once you add per-mount flags it
> only needs to be added in a single place. Actually probably a lowelevel
> one taking inode,vfsmount and wrappers for a struct file * or
> struct nameidata * which would cover most of the cases.

actually I started the BME patches by extending the
IS_RDONLY() macro to take two arguments, the inode
and the vfsmount (which sounded natural to me) but
that was shot down ... (don't remember why exactly)

no problem with a file_readonly() or nd_readonly()
if that makes folks happy ...

thanks,
Herbert

0 new messages