On the Ground: Joseph Stiglitz in Ethiopia

Joseph Stiglitz

Joseph Stiglitz is a Nobel-winning economist who is also the author of several books on international economic issues. He was chief economist at the World Bank and chairman of President Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, and has contributed to many diverse areas of economics. Lately, he has also written incisively about the costs of our involvement in Iraq.

It’s good to be back in Ethiopia, which is abuzz with plans to celebrate its millennium. The country is on the Coptic calendar, which does not have a leap year, and so theirs took place on September 11. Understandably, the government is very worried about a terrorist attack and canceled some events and boosted security around the country as well as in the capital, Addis Ababa. There are checkpoints all across the country and driving into Addis last week from the east near the Somaliland border, we got stuck in traffic behind dozens of trucks, as all vehicles are being searched as they enter the city.

Ethiopia has been an ally with the United States in the war against terror but has also been criticized for its lack of press freedom and the way it handled parliamentary elections in 2005. The controversial elections sparked protests and the jailing of a number of opposition members and journalists who had demonstrated against the government. Prime Minister Meles had said he needed to wait for the courts to make a decision, but hinted that, after the legal process had been given the opportunity to render its verdict, he would give an amnesty to those convicted. That is what he did, and 30 of the opposition leaders were released in July.

I met with the Prime Minister and several of his economic advisors last week to talk about how Ethiopia can keep its economy growing. GDP has expanded by an impressive 10 percent a year since 2003. My first trip to Ethiopia was in 1971 and a lot has changed since then. Even compared to my previous trip, two years ago, there are far more shops in Addis Ababa and there is quite a construction boom going on.

The government has done a lot to boost exports. It has encouraged the expansion of flower exports and these have grown from next to nothing in the late nineties to more than $150 million last year. There have been other successful cases of government intervention — for instance, encouraging an increase in “value added” leather goods. The sesame seed industry is expanding rapidly, taking advantage of rising prices and increasing demand from China. China is here, as it is in much of the rest of Africa, and making large contributions to infrastructure. We benefited from some of their excellent roads as we drove around the country. Ethiopia also receives a lot of aid from Western countries, partly because they feel the government uses it in ways that benefit the vast majority of the citizens. Traveling around, we saw a number of new schools, colleges and universities built by the current government as well as many health clinics and AIDS awareness projects.

Unsurprisingly, much of the support for the ruling EPRF comes from the countryside, especially Tigrey, where the Prime Minister and many of the leaders come from. Before Meles came to power in 1991, the country had been controlled by the Amhara people from the area around Addis Abba. This was the case not only during the oppressive regime of Hailie Selassie but during the even more oppressive regime of Colonel Mengistu Haile Mariam, who took power in a coup in 1974. So bad were matters during the Mengistu regime that per capita income declined from a paltry $180 in 1980-85 to $150 in 1990-1995.

Meles’ overthrow of Mengistu not only ended the Red Terror, but also centuries of domination by the Amharas. Power was devolved toward the regions, and a most unusual constitutional provision, giving regions rights to withdraw, ensured that the center would not abuse its powers.

The challenge now is to make sure Ethiopia’s growth continues. Inflation is on the rise, in part because of higher commodity prices—one of the results of opening up the economy is that it is now buffeted not only by the vagaries of the weather, but also those of international markets. Since food and energy are a large part of the consumer price index, the higher prices for food and energy show up strongly in the inflation numbers. Of course, higher prices are good for farmers who sell their crops even though they are bad for city dwellers who have to buy food.

Ethiopia also suffers from a lack of foreign exchange, which means it can’t afford machinery and equipment. Electricity shortages also make it hard to run heavy industry.

As we travel around the country we are saddened by how poor Ethiopia still is. A little bit of foreign aid would make a huge difference here. Let’s hope that the wealthy countries live up to their commitments.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Something about a certain war and continued threat of war with Eritrea, and a certain invasion of Somalia, somehow didn’t get mentioned… even World Bank/IMF “insider critics” still keep their blinders on? When you go to Sudan you’ll likewise write about “a lot more shops”?

“The controversial elections sparked protests and the jailing of a number of opposition members and journalists who had demonstrated against the government.”

As well as over 200 deaths.

“Let’s hope that the wealthy countries live up to their commitments.”

And why should they when the EPRDF doesn’t live up to its stated commitment to democracy?

“A little bit of foreign aid would make a huge difference here.”

As would a little bit of democracy.

Your post suggests that Meles is needed to guard against a re-imposition of Amhara tyranny, thus implying a link between Mengistu and the CUD and civil society figures that were imprisoned. I doubt any serious observer of Ethiopia would make that connection.

The bottom line is that Meles and his cronies, by hook, crook, or gun, will never allow themselves to lose ultimate power. And the violence that may ultimately breed will cost more in both financial and humanitarian terms than the value of the vaunted sesame seed output.

The China model beguiles another.

There is simply no excuse for the indifference towards immense suffering in developing nations that characterizes the international policies of developed nations. If we are able to improve the lives of those in developing nations like Ethiopia without having to make sacrifices of comparable moral importance, it is our obligation to do so. Now is as good a time as ever to increase the amount of aid we offer to the people of these struggling societies.

I’m very disappointed by Dr. Stiglitz’s failure to mention the bloody human rights abuses and repressive policies of the Meles regime. While Meles may be described “an ally” on the war on terror, he is not an ally in the struggle for freedom. I would encourage Dr. Stiglitz to meet with opposition parties so that he might understand another Ethiopian point of view.

It’s nice to hear news from Ethiopia that isn’t all bad. I’ve been fascinated by the place for years and finally got to take a vacation there in 2002. Whenever I mention that to anyone here in the US they want to know why anyone would visit a big desert full of starving people. It comes as a great surprise to them that Ethiopia is an ancient kingdom with a deeply rooted culture. I agree with you that there is no excuse for a country to be run by a single ethnic group in the 21st century. But, while I know large parts of the country became part of Ethiopia only in the 1800’s, I would hate to see this ancient country break up into little ethnic countries.

As for foreign aid, aid is only useful when it is spent well in a country that is governed well. Look at how well (by African standards) Somaliland is doing, and, because it isn’t recognized, it receives very little aid. Yes, Ethiopia could benefit from aid, but only with a transparent government that spends it well.

Thanks for writing some good news about Ethiopia.

Here is a call to Joseph Stiglitz: Please develop an “American Elite Peace Corps” program to CALL privileged students at MIT, Princeton, et al., to “SERVE our country” by delivering hands-on assistance to the people of Ethiopia, for starters.

Then, please CALL on on “University Endowment Managers” to DONATE funds for this cause, as a true example of “giving back.” THIS is the WAY to “winning hearts and minds.”

Will Joseph Stiglitz please answer this call? If not, where is the “leadership” for the 21st century going to come from?

God bless The New York Times for this platform for free speech.

(ISAIAH 55)

Dr. Stiglitz’s mention of the Meles regime’s human rights abuses was like just another economic fact, tossed into his column like a context setter. That we need to play such softball over issues such as 20 month detentions of political opposition leaders, not to mention the possibility of politically motivated killings should be a scandal.

It may be that US foreign policy calculus on the Ethiopian Government rightly adds up to some sort of accommodation against the larger strategic back-drop. But, we should be vocal about this despicable compromise and be doing everything possible to at least shame the Meles government into cleaning up its act. Dr. Stiglitz is given a privileged position to post on this platform, and he should use it much more responsibly and productively — if his interests are to truly support the people in this developing country.

Mr Stiglitz
I´m a Planning Secretary Cabinet Chief-officer of the State of Bahia, Brazil. Also a economist that play attention on your readings since your first time alert advising that the Washington agenda was a misteak for Latim America under the impact of a recession wave in the 80´s.
Now, after decades, the Labor Party won the state elections and we would like to invite you to open our Social and Economic Advisers Comitte. Is it possible?

I concur very strongly with Mr. Edelstein. I am frankly shocked by Dr. Stiglitz’s failing to mention the egregious human rights abuses of the Meles regime. I have worked for the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) in the horn of Africa and now work in a program for asylum seekers in Italy sponsored by the European Union and the Italian government. Over the past several years I have had a chance to interview and frequently help well over one thousand of the victims of the current Ethiopian regime.

These problems are hardly a deep secret known only by the select few in the human rights community. They are, practically, common knowledge. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have treated these problem in detail. Even the US State Department’s yearly human rights report strongly criticizes the Ethiopian regime’s human rights record.

Dr.Stiglitz’s glossing over these problems cannot be simply an oversight. The human rights problems in Ethiopia are too well known by anyone who would bother to look. It seems that this Nobel prize winning economist has had either a serious lapse in judgment or for some reason prefers to act as an apologist for the Meles regime.

Is Mr. Stiglitz aware that Ethiopia has invadeded Somalia last december?

Such a bloodshed and not a single word?

Does Stiglitz realize how the invasion of Somalia has boosted Ethiopian economic performances?

Does he realize that the “generosity” of “western” donors to a regime that’s labeled as one of the African worsts, is sinthetize inside the budget that the actual US’ administration has pumped-in as a reward for the – more than illegal -invasion of Somalia?

Does he knos what’s going on in Ogaden?

I think that the one who’s able to write such an article, deserves to be remeber as a danger for all the human beings

You always talk about good governance, yet you seem to have missed the Ethiopian executive branch’s usurp of power. You should do your homework a little more. Why are the regions so poor except for Tigray? Much of the money is going into the military at the expense of social services. The World Bank, DFID and some other donors even came up with PBS (protection of basic services) instead of DBS (direct budget support) so that EPRDF would not be the sole benificary of aid and it would be distributed to the regions in support of basic services. However, it is still going through the federal governement, the only difference is it is earmarked.

I appreciated Dr. Stiglitz’s coverage; it tried to portray the very complex situation that Ethiopia finds itself in. Yes, the current political situation is intolerable. The US government has chosen to walk arm in arm with the Meles regime, making the situation worse by easing his need to gather internal support and compromise. However, the hopeless poverty and lack of forward progress that the Meles regime inherited was even more intolerable. Reading the comments that followed the article, it sounded like Ethiopia is another Zimbabwe or Ivory Coast. The government has begun to bring tangible benefits to its people, by providing stability and support for development. Addis has seen tremendous growth. As Stiglitz mentioned, agricultural exports have boomed, providing steady private sector jobs, a rarity in the country. Ethiopia has even begun to receive legitimate foreign investment, including new immigrants building businesses there. While many have criticized China for not bringing freedom with wealth, the commentators here and elsewhere have tried to criticize Ethiopia for not bringing freedom before wealth. To pretend that a sudden opening up of the political dialogue in a country that speaks 84 indigenous languages would not cause violence and bloodshed at this stage is naive. There is no obvious dominant ethnic group in the country following the end of Amharic rule, and while Meles’s mainly Tigrayan rule is not great, traditional tribal/ethnic warfare is worse. We should recognize the tremendous accomplishments to date and hope that they continue long enough to build the stability necessary for a more open political process.

To echo the sentiments of some of the other commentators above: the human rights violations of the Meles government since the 2005 elections are worth more than a passing mention. Freedom of the press, peaceful assembly, and expression, among other basic rights, are currently severely repressed. Several organizations, including the International Red Cross and Doctors Without Borders, have had their humanitarian activities in the Ogaden region curtailed or stopped entirely by the Meles government, as a food crisis in the region looms.

In addition, it’s dangerous to portray the recent political history of Ethiopia as a story of competing ethnicities. I would argue that to describe Mengistu’s regime as primarily focused on protecting Amhara interests, or Meles’ regime as protecting Tigrayan interests, is inaccurate. In both cases, the party and personal interest seems to have been more powerful than ethnic interest. The poor state of development in the Tigray region, even relative to other regions of Ethiopia, seems to indicate that Meles’ home state has gotten little preferential treatment over the last decade-plus of his rule. It is fortunate that Ethiopia has not recently experienced the same level of ethnic warfare seen in so many other countries in the world, and we must careful not to give more importance to the ethnic dimension than it actually deserves.

The issue of increasing foreign aid is a difficult one. Ethiopia is one of the largest recipients of overseas development assistance in absolute terms, although the per-capita figure is low relative to many other countries. More aid would certainly help to alleviate poverty, especially in expanding coverage and benefit levels in initiatives like the employment-based Productive Safety Nets Program, but increased aid must come with a consistency in condemning human rights violations when they happen. A great many Ethiopians have suffered abuses that could perhaps have been prevented had the international community been less quiet.

Haven’t I been hearing from the left since 2003 or so that it is not America’s business to bring democracy to other countries? One country in particular? If Ethiopia is a dictatorship than so be it!! It was you hypocrites who said America should not impose democracy on other nations. When America takes a hands-off policy towards other nations human rights records, the left complains about America being indifferent to the lack of democracy.The overall point? The left will attack America no matter what it policies are. They disagree fundamentally with the way this country operates, at home and abroad. They are and will remain permanent critics of this nation. They will never be satisfied with American policy.

A question about ethnicity: How are ethnic groups defined? This question applies not only to Ethopia, but certainly to Iraq and most countries of the Middle East and Africa (to limit it to those). Are genetic tests applied to test for the “ethnicity” of various peoples? Probably not. Ethnic differences are cultural. Whether one speaks Farsi or Arabic–or Hindi vs Urdu–is not enough to define a people. Without disrespect to the power and value of tribes, the divisions we must all deal with are essentially cultural, and at some level tribal, not “ethnic.”

What amazed me about Stiglitz’s comments as well as those of others above is the lack of acknowledgment that the largest ethnonation in the Ethiopian empire is the Oromo people who have a centuries long democratic tradition. Also unacknowledged is the colonization of the Oromo and the other ethnonations into the Ethiopian empire by the Abyssinians during the Scramble for Africa in the late nineteenth century. Development issues in Ethiopia cannot be discussed apart from the issue of colonialism and the continued repression of the non-Abyssinian peoples in the land. The failure of Stiglitz to address those issues and the ongoing human rights abuses in Ethiopia is tragic.

It’s striking reading about an american “hand off policy” towards Ethiopia

It’s also striking to see that nobody cares about some thousand somali people killed, hundred thousand displaced and other condamned to famine.

Mogadisciu’s mayor refuses to feed woman and children in some locations labelling them as “terrorist”, UN’s silent, as USA, as NYT.
The same happens with/in Ogaden, again nobody cares

Nobody cares, it seems as if you americans have not realized that your country is fighting another war in Somalia, thru ethiopian proxies

DO YOU KNOW US’ WAGED WAR TO SOMALIA?

DO YOU KNOW US and Ethiopia are quagmired in another bloodeshed, or you’ll wait until a somali wil blast himself in New York to think about it?

Economy vs. Race in conflicts

On learning about Ethiopian conflicts my thought turned to the following direction.

I used to find it funny that people lumped far east Asians into one racial stereotype. Often, being of Korean origin was regarded the not different from Chinese and Japanese. The history of regional conflicts witnesses contrary to this homogeneity. This lack of homogeneity is also apparent when it comes to Europe (e.g. the Balkan nations) , Middle East (e.g. Iraq), and even more so in Africa, with genocides (e.g. Rwanda, Sudan).

What are the driving factors for conflict-is it resources or is it ethnic differences ? Which is the driving factor ? I used to think fighting for resources seemed like the stronger factor. I am beginning to think the opposite now looking at the Kurdish, Sunni and Shia conflict over oil-rich regions. If these folks felt that they were all one then they would cooperate to share the wealth.

The factor that seems to work in both Europe and Asia to in terms to promoting peace is that the world has become global and the difference between the subgroups are small against the outside (in both these cases the superpower to compete with is the U.S.). On looking at this, I wonder if Africa could converge through a union similar to Europe-but this will depend largely on whether the global perception of their identity converges towards each other in comparison to the external superpowers. Ath this time, the conflicts remain at the tribal level. Outside aid will have to continue until both the average economic and educational levels rise up to catch up with the rest of the world. In this respect, the presence of Chinese interventions in several African countries have the potential to play a pivotal role of raising the economy and providing and external factor for African nations to unite.

Even when this smaller division between large blocks is realized, there is potential for more scarier conflicts between the blocksturning into an Orwellian dystopia.

Recently, Science Journal published studies on this human interactions issue in the current issue. Below are links and a summary from the editors.

“Human Interactions-Humans have continuously interacted with natural systems. Liu et al. (p. 1513) review the intricate nature of the organizational, spatial, and temporal couplings of human and natural systems. Case studies on different continents suggest that couplings have evolved from direct to more indirect interactions, from adjacent to more distant linkages, from local to global scales, and from simple to complex patterns and processes. An appreciation of such interactions should help in the development of effective policies for ecological and socioeconomic sustainability. Humans not only interact with nature but with one another in groups. Lim et al. (p. 1540) have adapted concepts of phase separation familiar in chemistry and physics to study patterns in global populations that can help predict and perhaps prevent conflicts. They posit that violence arises at boundaries between regions that are not sufficiently well defined. A model based on spatial distributions of ethnic groups gave good predictions about regions of violence in the former Yugoslavia and in India.”

//www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/317/5844/1540
Lim et al. Global Pattern Formation and Ethnic/Cultural Violence

//www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/317/5844/1513
Liu et al. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems

I think I agree with many of the comments which draw attention to the human rights issue. The extreme poverty is also a human rights issue. Ethiopians have a proud heritage which goes back thousands of years, and one in which the society was mostly integrated. I spent last weekend celebrating the Millennium with the Ethiopian community here in Chicago. People were very optimistic about the future, but were concerned with Article 39 and the introduction of ethnicity into the government in their Homeland. It would be a dangerous step to allow governance to be drawn along ethnic boundaries (a la Rwanda), and I hope there are ways for the global community to discourage it.

Happy New Year and a Happy Millennium to Ethiopians everywhere!