Michelle Obama Goes Sleeveless, Again

Michelle ObamaDoug Mills/The New York Times First Lady Michelle Obama applauded during the president’s speech to Congress.

Nancy Reagan wore spangled ballgowns. Barbara Bush had fake pearls. Michelle Obama wears her bare arms.

It is February and Washington is freezing, but in appearance after appearance, the first lady displays her long, muscular arms. She is sleeveless on the cover of the new Vogue, she was sleeveless when she discussed menus on Sunday in the White House kitchen, and last night she was sleeveless again, in the House chamber for her husband’s first address to Congress. (All of the other women in the room seemed to be wearing long sleeves; a few even wore turtlenecks). If she keeps going at this rate, Mrs. Obama may do to dresses with sleeves what President John F. Kennedy did to men’s hats.

“Oh my god,” Cindi Leive, the editor of Glamour magazine, exclaimed while watching the address, she said via email. “The First Lady has bare arms in Congress, in February, at night!”

Mrs. Obama’s super-sculpted arms are the result of years of effort. When her children were young, she began working out with a personal trainer, splitting sessions with girlfriends to save money. In recent years, she has exercised several times a week, often rising hours before her daughters to do cardio and lift weights, or spending Saturday sessions with the same personal trainer who guided her husband. At the gym, she is focused and competitive, friends say, counting her reps and teasing when they do not finish theirs.

Now those arms have become Mrs. Obama’s most constant accessory, whether she is wearing a Gap sundress or a designer ballgown. On the Vogue cover, the first lady wears little makeup, subtle jewelry, a simple sheath. It’s her arms that pop out, rippled and gleaming.

Already, a debate is brewing about just what the First Arms signify. “Post-Title IX arms,” Robin Givhan called them in the Washington Post. They represent achievement and self-control, wrote Kate Holmquist in the Irish Times. (Buff arms say: “I’m too serious a woman to show off my legs or my breasts,” she argued.)

So Michelle Obama is athletic and disciplined. Yes, fine, but that was pretty clear before we started examining her triceps on a daily basis. Instead, those bare arms seem like a reminder of everything about her we can’t see.

In two years, she has shown us a great deal of herself, more than most of us would share, and yet right now, we actually don’t know that much about her. What does she think of the White House, and what does she do all day? Does her husband consult her on any of the difficult decisions he faces? Is the “Mom-in-chief” really, totally confident that her children are going to come through this just fine? In a few years, will she still look as confident as she did last night, or will she reach for cover? And is she comfortable as she looks in those skimpy tops, or is she actually freezing?

(A postscript, and a precedent: in 1963, Jacqueline Kennedy wore a sleeveless black sheath to her husband’s State of the Union address. Click here to see how different she looked from many of the other women in the gallery, some of whom were in hats and bits of fur. Thanks to Times reader Kathy W. for the tip and the photo link.)

Comments are no longer being accepted.

It’s enshrined in the second amendment that Michelle Obama has the right to bare arms.

Why is this in the political blog? Doesn’t this belong in a style blog? All the issues this speech tackled and you’re talking about Michelle Obama’s arms?

Why is this even posted as “news”! I admire her for her strength and individuality, not what she wears (or doesn’t). It seems like you want so badly to pigeon hole her…Good Luck!!!

Michelle looked WONDERFUL.

When she made her entrance, her sleeveless arms were the first thing I noticed. Very brave, actually, but then she usually is with her clothes. She is only 3 years younger than me, but my arms (along with the rest of me) do NOT look like that. It makes sense that she would be pretty eager to show them off!

What does she do all day? We’ve seen her visit every federal agency, make elegant and gracious speeches, take her daughters to school, host state dinners, visit schools, invite students to the White House, endure the scrutiny of every detail of what she wears at all times, and get used to a new city and a new life, all while supporting a POTUS who inherited a nightmare of a situation. And that’s just the first 30 days. Try to keep up.

Love Michelle, doesn’t matter what she wears…love Our President. He can actually talk and he is giving us all hope, Thank You.

Does this signify the beginning of a new “Arms” Race? Or is this about the Second Amendment, and the right to “bare arms”?

The First Lady looked beautiful. Also, she was inside, why shouldn’t she be sleeveless. Oh, and by the way, she wore a matching coat to the Capitol. Your remarks sound “catty”……maybe you wish you could look as good as the First Lady in a sleeveless dress…

The president’s wife and his children are off limits.

The congress-people’s wives and husbands and children are likewise.

Governor’s children and wives and husbands are likewise.

I do not buy into this bull that because Ms Obama is the so-called “first-lady” that her life or her children’s are in the public domain but rather that she and her children are in a private domain and that they deserve and have a right
to that privacy.

Privacy is still a right in this country.

Whereas Sarah Palin unfortunately and unwittingly puts a bulls-eye on her self, her children and her husband still have a right to their privacy.

Palin’s husband drew attention to himself when he belonged to an organization that encouraged succession from the Union, and that made him made him a rightful target in view of the fact that his wife is the governor of that State. Otherwise, his life is his own.

Why is there so much emphasis on Michelle Obama’s personal appearance? This seems to reinforce the idea that a woman’s appearance is what really matters, not her intelligence and accomplishments. Appearance is only superficial. Men are not subject to such scrutiny about their appearance. There is a double-standard. I think this subject matter is sexist.

“…those arms have become Mrs. Obama’s most constant accessory…” – She never leaves home without them.

Maybe there should be a separate blog dedicated to Michelle Obama’s latest fashion statement, because this is getting just a tad ridiculous.

Ohmygawd, the scoop of the year!!
Who cares? You’re an embarrassment, NYT.

Now there’s a real goal for American womanhood — rising before dawn to see your personal trainer so you can have sculpted arms.

How about the young student Michelle Obama put her arms around, standing next to her. Now that’s a story the New York Times should not pass up.

8th grader Ty’Sheoma Bethea wrote congress describing the dilapidated conditions plaguing her school, which was built in 1896, claiming the funds would improve the building and the quality of education.

Obama quoted her in his speech.

“We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself, and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina, but also the world. We are not quitters.”

Thats when Michelle Obama gave her a big hug.

Sadly the governor of South Carolina says he wants to turn down the money.

Kathleen Hussein in Maine February 25, 2009 · 6:38 am

She’s proud of her arms, rightfully so, she’s attracted to sleeveless dresses, and they do suit her, and she took enough flak for putting a sweater over that Thakoon dress on election night in Grant Park. And let me add, I think her dark skin looks gorgeous in February in a way that my dry, flaky winter-white skin doesn’t.

She’s fit, fun and a little bit edgy in a totally appropriate way, and she’s 44. Ask any woman over 50, your sleeveless days are numbered. Go for it.

Finally, we have a First Lady who is down to earth, with no pretention, intelligent and beautiful, sincere and honest. I guess, Republicans, Fox News and their sycophants do not deserve such a classy lady (or perhaps, they are afraid). Now, we have a chance to export a little culture and savoir-faire around the world, instead of invasions and lectures and arrogance. Oops, Wolfowitz, Bolton, Cheney, will not agree with that.

Uhhh…. As a liberal democrat, I would like to see this “news” about Michelle Obama’s fashion sense moved to the Style section. She is a beautiful woman who dressed very elegantly for last night’s speech, but that doesn’t qualify for the political page. Sure, the public wants to know about her personal fashions, but we know that the substance of her husband’s work is what qualifies as political news.

As a supporter of Michelle Obama her sleevelessness has become embarrassing! It was played up this past summer during the Democratic Primary and it appears that she is unable to get past the adulation and admiration and dress appropriately for the occasion, her role as “First Lady”, and the weather. As a black professional woman and a mother it saddens me to see her present herself constantly in this manner. My female colleagues, friends, and family, state that it is an insult to black women who have work so long and hard to be taken seriously, and to be respected in the workplace and not treated as some sex object. We too have beautiful sculptured black arms and skin, but are aware that there is an appropriate time and place to “bare” all. Even Michelle would admit to the inappropriateness of dress of a woman who has large breasts and wears deep cut v-neck blouses and sweaters in the workplace that exposes too much. Does she intend to dress in this same manner on trips of foreign affairs in countries where woman dress more modestly because of religious reasons or just general customs?
A friend or family member should take her aside and remind her that she is not just Michelle Obama any longer, but is the “First Lady” of this great country. She cannot miss if she adheres to the time valued adage, “Less is more, and oh so classy”!

But so what, she looks great!

Did it ever occur to you that Michelle Obama might have a different temperature setting? Some people CAN do this you know, they just don’t need as much heat as the rest of us. The fact that she could dress like she did at the innaguration, walking down the street radically underdressed compared to most of us…My guess is that she has a threshold that allows her to dress less. Katharine Hepburn who was also famous for her ability to embrace cold said “People just don’t understand how delicious it is to suffer” Hepburn swam in the Long Island sound even in winter into her old age. Perhaps Michelle is one of those people. Did you ask?
Maybe clothes make her hot.
C. Click Yamamoto

How about an interview, Ms. Kantor? I’d love t hear her responses to the questions you pose in the last paragraph, and I have just about had my fill of fashion reviews. I know, I know — plenty of other women love to talk fashion — but there’s something so retro about ONLY talking fashion or hairstyles about a bright, well-educated, opinionated, strong woman. It is one of the screwy things about our culture that we seem to feel more favorably disposed towards our First Ladies if they keep their mouth shut.

The First Lady Michelle Obama has many positive qualities that are so much more positive to write about than your “skimpy top” statement. She has become a roll model for many girls and women is this nation. She is in her own right, a successful woman, as well as a great Mom amd wife…. and daughter. She obviously has a great deal to offer. Please stop wasting print and time on caddy remarks. Show that you can live up to Your potetial and write about something worth while.

The President of the United States makes the most important speech of the year… and the response of the Paper of Records’ *political* blog is talk about he arms of his wife?

I think it’s time for a change of Administration at this blog.

Peter Steinberg
//www.FlashlightWorthyBooks.com

I think Michelle Obama looked completely inappropriate. There is a “professional” dress code where both men and women wear business attire, in most cases a suit. Her husband was wearing a suit and so was everybody else. She was not at a cocktail party. While showing off her arms is certainly her prerogative, in this case, it showed a curious lack of knowledge about what one wears to Congress or even a business meeting.